Pelvic Incidence Angle in Standing, Maximal Anterior and Maximal Posterior Pelvic Rotation in a Sample of Healthy Subjects

  • Majid Rezvani Department of Neurosurgery, School of Medicine, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran. AND Isfahan Neurosciences Research Center, Alzahra Research Institute, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.
  • Homayoun Tabesh Department of Neurosurgery, School of Medicine, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.
  • Masih Saboori Department of Neurosurgery, School of Medicine, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran. AND Isfahan Neurosciences Research Center, Alzahra Research Institute, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.
  • Ali Akrami Department of Neurosurgery, School of Medicine, Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences, Kermanshah, Iran.
  • Mehdi Shafiei Department of Neurosurgery, School of Medicine, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran. AND Isfahan Neurosciences Research Center, Alzahra Research Institute, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.
  • Mohammad Reza Akrami Department of Neurosurgery, School of Medicine, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.
Keywords: Pelvic incidence, Sacral slope, Pelvic tilt, Lumbar lordosis

Abstract

This study aimed to investigate the differences in pelvic incidence (PI) between three standing, maximal anterior and maximal posterior pelvic rotation. This cross-sectional study was done on 150 healthy subjects. Lateral spine radiography was taken in 3 different positions in the same standard radiographic protocol. Sacral slope (SS) pelvic tilt (PT), lumbar lordosis (LL) and lumbosacral junction angle were measured by two independent, experienced spine surgeons. PI was calculated as sum SS and PT. The mean of PI in standing positions was 52.6±5.1, in anterior position was 52.6±5.5 and in posterior position was 52.3±5.2 degree. The mean of PI, PT, and SS in total and between male and female subjects was not statistically significant in three different positions (P>0.05). PI in 136 subjects (90.7%) is changed when the position was changed from standing to the posterior position, by mean of 2.06 degree. When the position was changed from standing to an anterior position, the change in PI degree was observed in 126 subjects (84%) by mean of 2.12 degree. Despite the none, significant value of PI in three different positions, a large number of subjects with a change in their PI when the position was changed to anterior or posterior (90.1%) position, show that PI can be varied by pelvic rotation in healthy adult subjects.

References

1. Legaye J, Duval-Beaupere G, Hecquet J, Marty C. Pelvic incidence: a fundamental pelvic parameter for three-dimensional regulation of spinal sagittal curves. Eur Spine J 1998;7:99-103.
2. Duval-Beaupere G, Schmidt C, Cosson A. Barycentremetric study of the sagittal shape of spine and pelvis: The conditions required for an economic standing position. Ann Biomed Eng 1992;20:451-62.
3. Vaz G, Roussouly P, Berthonnaud E, Dimnet J. Sagittal morphology and equilibrium of pelvis and spine. Eur Spine J 2002;11:80-7.
4. Hammerberg EM, Wood KB. Sagittal profile of the elderly. J Spinal Disord Tech 2003;16:44-50.
5. Berthonnaud E, Dimnet J, Roussouly P, Labelle H. Analysis of the sagittal balance of the spine and pelvis using shape and orientation parameters. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2005;18:40-7.
6. Boulay C, Tardieu C, Hecquet J, Benaim C, Mouilleseaux B, Marty C, et al. Sagittal alignment of spine and pelvis regulated by pelvic incidence: standard values and prediction of lordosis. Eur Spine J 2006;15:415-22.
7. Morris WZ, Fowers CA, Yuh RT, Gebhart JJ, Salata MJ, Liu RW. Decreasing pelvic incidence is associated with greater risk of cam morphology. Bone Joint Res 2016;5:387-92.
8. Jin H.M, Xu D.L, Xuan J, Chen JX, Chen K, Goswami A, et al. Changes in Pelvic Incidence, Pelvic Tilt, and Sacral Slope in Situations of Pelvic Rotation. Clin Spine Surg 2017;30:E923-30.
9. Place HM, Hayes AM, Huebner S, Hayden A, Israel H, Brechbuhler J. Pelvic incidence: a fixed value or can you change it? Spine J 2017;17:1565-9.
10. Vrtovec T, Janssen M, Likar B, Castelein RM, Viergever MA, Pernus F. A review of methods for evaluating the quantitative parameters of sagittal pelvic alignment. Spine J 2012;12:433-46.
11. Weinberg DS, Morris WZ, Gebhart JJ, Liu RW. Pelvic incidence: An anatomic investigation of 880 cadaveric specimens. Eur Spine J 2016;25:3589-95.
12. Mac-Thiong JM, Labelle H, Berthonnaud E, Betz RR, Roussouly P. Sagittal spinopelvic balance in normal children and adolescents. Eur Spine J 2007;16:227-34.
13. Barrey C, Jund J, Noseda O, Roussouly P. Sagittal balance of the pelvis-spine complex and lumbar degenerative diseases. A comparative study about 85 cases. Eur Spine J 2007;16:1459-67.
14. Mac-Thiong JM, Berthonnaud E, Dimar JR, Betz RR, Labelle H. Sagittal alignment of the spine and pelvis during growth. Spine 2004;29:1642-7.
15. Janssen MM, Drevelle X, Humbert L, Skalli W, Castelein RM. Differences in male and female spino-pelvic alignment in asymptomatic young adults: a three-dimensional analysis using upright low-dose digital biplanar X-rays. Spine 2009;34:E826-32.
16. Mac-Thiong JM, Roussouly P, Berthonnaud E, Guigui P. Sagittal parameters of global spinal balance: normative values from a prospective cohort of seven hundred nine Caucasian asymptomatic adults. Spine 2010;35:E1193-8.
17. Vialle R, Levassor N, Rillardon L, Templier A, Skalli W, Guigui P. Radiographic analysis of the sagittal alignment and balance of the spine in asymptomatic subjects. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2005;87:260-7.
Published
2019-01-22
How to Cite
1.
Rezvani M, Tabesh H, Saboori M, Akrami A, Shafiei M, Akrami MR. Pelvic Incidence Angle in Standing, Maximal Anterior and Maximal Posterior Pelvic Rotation in a Sample of Healthy Subjects. Acta Med Iran. 56(12):796-802.
Section
Articles