<?xml version="1.0"?>
<Articles JournalTitle="Acta Medica Iranica">
  <Article>
    <Journal>
      <PublisherName>Tehran University of Medical Sciences</PublisherName>
      <JournalTitle>Acta Medica Iranica</JournalTitle>
      <Issn>0044-6025</Issn>
      <Volume>65</Volume>
      <Issue>5</Issue>
      <PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
        <Year>2026</Year>
        <Month>07</Month>
        <Day>06</Day>
      </PubDate>
    </Journal>
    <title locale="en_US">Septoplasty Anaesthesia: Optimising Haemodynamics, Blood Conservation, and Postoperative Nausea Control: A Randomised Comparative Study</title>
    <FirstPage>317</FirstPage>
    <LastPage>328</LastPage>
    <AuthorList>
      <Author>
        <FirstName>Ali Najeh</FirstName>
        <LastName>Al-Awwady</LastName>
        <affiliation locale="en_US">Department of Surgery, College of Medicine, Jabir ibn Hayyan University for Medical and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Al-Najaf, Iraq</affiliation>
      </Author>
    </AuthorList>
    <History>
      <PubDate PubStatus="received">
        <Year>2026</Year>
        <Month>04</Month>
        <Day>26</Day>
      </PubDate>
      <PubDate PubStatus="accepted">
        <Year>2026</Year>
        <Month>05</Month>
        <Day>16</Day>
      </PubDate>
    </History>
    <abstract locale="en_US">Septoplasty is a common otolaryngological procedure in which a bloodless surgical field is critical for safe and accurate surgery. Deliberate hypotension is widely used to minimise intra-operative bleeding and optimise visibility, but the relative haemodynamic stability, blood-conservation efficacy, and postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) profile of total intravenous anaesthesia (TIVA) compared with combined intravenous&#x2013;inhalational techniques in septoplasty are not fully established. This study aimed to compare propofol&#x2013;remifentanil TIVA with a combined intravenous&#x2013;inhalational technique (isoflurane plus metoprolol and glyceryl trinitrate) in patients undergoing septoplasty, with regard to haemodynamic stability, intra-operative blood loss, and PONV. A prospective, single-centre, parallel-arm, open-label randomised clinical trial was conducted at Al-Najaf Teaching Hospital, Iraq, between December 2022 and October 2023, and is reported in accordance with the CONSORT 2010 statement. Forty patients aged 16&#x2013;50 years (ASA physical status I&#x2013;II) were randomly allocated 1:1 by an independent biostatistician using a computer-generated block-randomisation sequence (block size 4). Allocation was concealed in sequentially numbered, opaque, sealed envelopes, which were opened only after enrolment and immediately before induction. Patients were assigned to combined intravenous&#x2013;inhalational anaesthesia (Group A, n=20) or TIVA with propofol and remifentanil (Group B, n=20). The pre-specified primary endpoint was the proportion of patients achieving and maintaining the deliberate-hypotension target (MAP 50-65 mmHg) for &#x2265;90% of the intra-operative period. Secondary endpoints were intra-operative blood loss, PONV incidence within 24 h, operative time, and recovery profile. Heart rate, systolic and diastolic blood pressure, MAP, intra-operative blood loss, and PONV up to 24 h after surgery were recorded. Both groups achieved the deliberate-hypotension target within five minutes of induction and maintained stable haemodynamics throughout surgery. Intra-operative blood loss did not differ significantly between groups (TIVA 119.0&#xB1;14.10 mL vs combined 121.5&#xB1;14.60 mL; P=0.548). PONV occurred in 25% of TIVA patients and 35% of combined-anaesthesia patients (P=0.503); no episodes of vomiting were recorded in either group within 24 h. Female sex was significantly associated with PONV (P=0.014). Operative time and recovery profiles were similar between the two groups. Both TIVA and combined intravenous&#x2013;inhalational anaesthesia, when titrated to identical haemodynamic targets, showed no statistically significant differences in haemodynamic stability, intra-operative blood loss, or PONV outcomes during septoplasty. Because the study was not designed or powered as a formal equivalence or non-inferiority trial, these findings should be interpreted as hypothesis-generating rather than as proof of clinical equivalence. Either technique may be selected on the basis of patient-specific factors, drug availability, and clinician preference.</abstract>
    <web_url>https://acta.tums.ac.ir/index.php/acta/article/view/12097</web_url>
    <pdf_url>https://acta.tums.ac.ir/index.php/acta/article/download/12097/6057</pdf_url>
  </Article>
</Articles>
