<?xml version="1.0"?>
<Articles JournalTitle="Acta Medica Iranica">
  <Article>
    <Journal>
      <PublisherName>Tehran University of Medical Sciences</PublisherName>
      <JournalTitle>Acta Medica Iranica</JournalTitle>
      <Issn>0044-6025</Issn>
      <Volume>50</Volume>
      <Issue>2</Issue>
      <PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
        <Year>2012</Year>
        <Month>02</Month>
        <Day>15</Day>
      </PubDate>
    </Journal>
    <title locale="en_US">Right Bundle Branch Block Is not a Predictor of Coronary Artery Disease</title>
    <FirstPage>117</FirstPage>
    <LastPage>121</LastPage>
    <Language>EN</Language>
    <AuthorList>
      <Author>
        <FirstName>Amir Farhang</FirstName>
        <LastName>Zand Parsa</LastName>
        <affiliation locale="en_US">Department of Cardiology, Imam Khomeini Medical Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.</affiliation>
      </Author>
      <Author>
        <FirstName>Ladan</FirstName>
        <LastName>Haghighi</LastName>
        <affiliation locale="en_US">Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Shahid Akbarabadi Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.</affiliation>
      </Author>
    </AuthorList>
    <History>
      <PubDate PubStatus="received">
        <Year>2015</Year>
        <Month>09</Month>
        <Day>28</Day>
      </PubDate>
    </History>
    <abstract locale="en_US">Right bundle branch block (RBBB) is considered as an important predictor of poor outcome in&#xA0;patients with acute myocardial infarction, but the prognostic implication of RBBB in patients with suspected&#xA0;coronary artery disease (CAD) is unclear. Furthermore, the association between RBBB and incidence of CAD&#xA0;also its influence on the severity of stenosis in coronary arteries has not been established. This study was&#xA0;designed to assess the relationship between RBBB and the presence and the severity of CAD in patients with&#xA0;suspected CAD. The study population consisted of 172 patients with RBBB and 174 patients with normal&#xA0;resting electrocardiography (ECG). Severity of CAD was defined as estimated Gensini score according to the&#xA0;degree, quantity and distribution of lesions in angiographic study. According to our study based on&#xA0;angiographic investigations, in patients with RBBB the prevalence of CAD was 77.3 percent versus 70.1&#xA0;percent in patients with normal resting ECG (P=0.13). Also, there was no significant association between the&#xA0;presence of RBBB and magnitude of Gensini score (OR=0.87, P=0.62). However, male gender and history of&#xA0;diabetes mellitus were associated with higher Gensini score (OR=3.41; 95% CI: 1.96-5.93, P&lt;0.0001 and&#xA0;OR=3.22; 95% CI: 1.77-5.87, P&lt;0.0001 respectively). This study suggests that although RBBB was&#xA0;associated with more severity of stenosis in left coronary system (LAD&amp;LCX), but as a whole there was no&#xA0;association between RBBB and the presence and severity of CAD.</abstract>
    <web_url>https://acta.tums.ac.ir/index.php/acta/article/view/3869</web_url>
    <pdf_url>https://acta.tums.ac.ir/index.php/acta/article/download/3869/3844</pdf_url>
  </Article>
</Articles>
