Evaluation of Thyromental Height Test for Predicting Difficult Laryngoscopy in Morbid Obese Patients Candidate for Bariatric Surgery: An Observational Study
Abstract
Upper airway management in morbid obese patients undergoing bariatric surgery is a major challenge during induction of anesthesia. Bed side Thyromental Height Test (TMHT) is an easy and valid predictor for prediction of difficult airway in non‑obese patients, but its precision in morbid obese patients haven’t been evaluated yet. The purpose of present study is to find the accuracy of TMHT for the prediction of difficult laryngoscopy in morbid obese patients undergoing bariatric surgery. The present prospective observational study was performed on 95 morbid obese patients at Sina hospital during 2020. Preoperative exams of patients include the assessment of Mallampati classification, thyromental height, thyromental, sternomental and interincisor distances. After induction of anesthesia, the laryngoscopy view was evaluated using the Cormack Lehane classification, and the relationship between these tests to prediction of difficult laryngoscopy view based on the Cormack Lehane degrees (grades 3,4) were evaluated. A total of 95 morbid obese patients with a mean BMI of 44.7±5.6 kg/m2.were included in the study. 67.3% of them were women. The incidence of difficult laryngoscopy (C & L III, IV) was 16.8%. TMHT less than 56.5 mm, with 98% positive predictive value and 93% accuracy was the best predictor of difficult intubation in these patients. The accuracy of thyromental, sternomental and interincisor distance, with cut off value less than 51.5 mm, 89.5 mm, 41.5 mm respectively was less than TMHT in prediction of difficult laryngoscopy in morbid obese patients. In morbid obese patients with a BMI greater than 40, thyromental height less than 56.5 mm with 98% positive predictive value and 93% accuracy is the best predictor for difficult laryngoscopy view.
2. Ahmed AM, Zaky MN, El-Mekawy NM, Ollaek MA, Sami WM, Mohamed DM. Evaluation of thyromental height test in prediction of difficult airway in obese surgical patients: An observational study. Indian J Anaesth 2021;65:880-5.
3. Etezadi F, Ahangari A, Shokri H, Najafi A, Khajavi MR, Daghigh M, et al. Thyromental height: a new clinical test for prediction of difficult laryngoscopy. Anesth Analg 2013;117:1347–51.
4. Etezadi F, Saeedinia L, Pourfakhr P, Najafi A, Khajavi M, Ahangari A, et al. Comparison of Four Methods for Predicting Difficult Laryngoscopy: A Prospective Study of Validity Indexes. Arch Anesth Crit Care 2018;4:483-7.
5. Jain N, Das S, Kanchi M. Thyromental height test for prediction of difficult laryngoscopy in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgical procedure. Ann Card Anaesth 2017;20:207-11.
6. Palczynski P, Bialka S, Misiolek H, Copik M, Smelik A, Szarpak L, et al. Thyromental height test as a new method for prediction of difficult intubation with double lumen tube. PLoS One 2018;13:e0201944.
7. Mostafa M, Saeed M, Hasanin A, Badawy S, Khaled D. Accuracy of thyromental height test for predicting difficult intubation in elderly. J Anesth 2020;34:217-23.
8. Rao KV, Dhatchinamoorthi D, Nandhakumar A, Selvarajan N, Akula HR, Thiruvenkatarajan V. Validity of thyromental height test as a predictor of difficult laryngoscopy: a prospective evaluation comparing modified Mallampati score, interincisor gap, thyromental distance, neck circumference, and neck extension. Indian J Anaesth 2018;62:603-8.
9. Apfelbaum JL, Hagberg CA, Connis RT, Abdelmalak BB, Agarkar M, Dutton RP, et al. 2022 American Society of Anesthesiologists Practice Guidelines for Management of the Difficult Airway. Anesthesiology 2022;136:31-81.
10. Yousef GT, Abdalgalil DA, Ibrahim TH. Orotracheal intubation of morbidly obese patients, comparison of GlideScope(®) video laryngoscope and the LMA CTrach™ with direct laryngoscopy. Anesth Essays Res 2012;6:174‑9.
11. De Jong A, Molinari N, Pouzeratte Y, Verzilli D, Chanques G, Jung B, et al. Difficult intubation in obese patients: Incidence, risk factors, and complications in the operating theatre and in intensive care units. Br J Anaesth 2015;114:297‑306.
12. Sajayan A, Wicker J, Ungureanu N, Mendonca C, Kimani PK. Current practice of rapid sequence induction of anaesthesia in the UK-A national survey. Br J Anaesth 2016;11:69-74.
13. Lundstrøm LH, Møller AM, Rosenstock C, Astrup G, Wetterslev J. High body mass index is a weak predictor for difficult and failed tracheal intubation: a cohort study of 91,332 consecutive patients scheduled for direct laryngoscopy registered in the Danish Anesthesia Database. Anesthesiology 2009;110:266-74.
14. Khan ZH, Rahimi M, Atabi T. Anticipated and Unanticipated Difficult Airway: A Practical and Logical Approach: A Narrative Review. Arch Anesth Crit Care 2018;4:505-8.
15. Ittichaikulthol W, Chanpradub S, Amnoundetchakorn S, Arayajarernwong N, Pawaropart N, Wongkum W. Modified Mallampati test and thyromental distance as a predictor of difficult laryngoscopy in Thai patients. J Med Assoc Thai 2010;93:84-9.
Files | ||
Issue | Vol 61 No 7 (2023) | |
Section | Original Article(s) | |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.18502/acta.v61i7.14494 | |
Keywords | ||
Morbid obesity Difficult intubation Modified mallampati test Thyromental height Airway management |
Rights and permissions | |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |