From Challenge-Based Learning to Relational Coordination: An Interdisciplinary Educational-Research Collaboration in Medical Journalism Education
,
Abstract
Interdisciplinary collaboration (IDC) faces several long-standing challenges including poor teamwork, resistance to socialization, inadequate attention given to learners' abilities, incomplete reporting, lack of quality methodology, and vague understanding of reflexivity. In an attempt to tackle these challenges, the purpose of this case study was to report an interdisciplinary educational-research collaboration (IDERC) involving two faculty members (NS and SA) from different departments who were simultaneously instructing a master’s student (St) in two separate courses. The methodology involved addressed the learning needs of St in two concurrent courses as well as fulfilling particular research activities. A few different reflection-gathering tools were adopted to elicit the two participants’ (SA and St) views on the impacts of the IDERC. Thematic analysis of SA’s interview concerning her experiences with the IDERC indicated that she was motivated by a range of personal, educational, and research factors. It also showed her positive outlook on how a similar IDERC could benefit faculty members and students as well as knowledge development. SA also went through the reasons why educators may be hesitant or resistant to deal with IDC. When probing St’s experiences with the IDERC incorporated inside his class tasks and an open-ended questionnaire, he not only highlighted the educational and research outcomes he gained, but also mentioned how he was influenced by the instructors' socialization behavior. Regarding the requirements of an IDC, St's main focus was on successful implementation and prioritizing efficiency. Suggestions are provided as to how this collaboration can be extended to larger contexts.
2. Ahmady S, Khajeali N, Mirmoghtadaie Z. Challenges and opportunities of acquiring scientific authority in medical sciences: determination of the experts’ views based on qualitative content analysis. J Adv Med Educ Prof 2020;8:32-41.
3. Bogossian F, New K, George K, Barr N, Dodd N, Hamilton AL, et al. The implementation of interprofessional education: a scoping review. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract 2023;28:243-277.
4. Spelt EJH, Biemans HJA, Tobi H, Luning PA, Mulder M. Teaching and Learning in Interdisciplinary Higher Education: A Systematic Review. Educ Psychol Rev 2009;21:365-78.
5. Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol 2006;3:77-101.
6. Olmos-Vega FM, Stalmeijer RE, Varpio L, Kahlke R. A practical guide to reflexivity in qualitative research: AMEE Guide No. 149. Med Teach 2022:1-11.
7. Christensen J, Ekelund N, Melin M, Widén P. The beautiful risk of collaborative and interdisciplinary research. A challenging collaborative and critical approach toward sustainable learning processes in academic profession. Sustainability 2021;13:4723.
8. Perna S, Recke MP, Nichols MH. Challenge based learning: A comprehensive survey of the literature. The Challenge Institute. 2023. (Accessed May, 2023 at https://www.challengeinstitute.org/CBL_Literature_Survey.pdf.)
9. van den Beemt AAJ, van de Watering G, Bots M. Conceptualizing variety in challenge-based learning in higher education: the CBL-compass. Eur J Eng Educ 2023;48:24-41.
10. Gallagher SE, Savage T. Challenge-based learning in higher education: An exploratory literature review. Teach High Educ 2023;28:1135-57.
11. Kohn Rådberg K, Lundqvist U, Malmqvist J, Hagvall Svensson O. From CDIO to challenge-based learning experiences–expanding student learning as well as societal impact? Eur J Eng Educ 2020;45:22-37.
12. Gittell JH. What is relational coordination? In: Gittell JH, editor. Relational coordination: Guidelines for theory, measurement and analysis. Waltham, MA: Brandeis University; 2011:3-14.
13. Bolton R, Logan C, Gittell JH. Revisiting relational coordination: A systematic review. J Appl Behav Sci 2021;57:290-322.
14. Daniel MM, Ross P, Stalmeijer RE, de Grave W. Teacher perspectives of interdisciplinary coteaching relationships in a clinical skills course: A relational coordination theory analysis. Teach Learn Med 2018;30:141-51.
15. Fuchsman K, Henry S. Rethinking integration in interdisciplinary studies. Issu Interdiscip Stud 2009;27:70-85.
16. Boden D, McNair LD, Borrego M. “Leave your discipline at the door”: Matching expectations for interdisciplinary collaboration among faculty members. High Educ Rev 2014;11:1-29.
17. Callard F, Fitzgerald D. Rethinking interdisciplinarity across the social sciences and neurosciences. Basingstoke (UK): Palgrave Macmillan; 2105.
18. Higgins LE, Smith JM. Documenting development of interdisciplinary collaboration among researchers by visualizing connections. Res Eval 2021;31:159-72.
19. Hintenach AM, Howe JL. Interprofessional care: Why teamwork matters. In: Chun A, ed. Geriatric practice: A competency-based approach to caring for older adults. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2020:491-500.
20. Alberto J, Herth K. Interprofessional collaboration within faculty roles: teaching, service, and research. Online J Issues Nurs 2009;14.
21. Mohammed CA, Chaturvedi A, Kamath MG, Ummer SV, Bajaj G. Influential factors affecting perceptions of interprofessional collaboration for advancing health outcomes: Insights and recommendations from an international fellowship program. Clin Epidemiol Global Health 2023;24:101411.
| Files | ||
| Issue | Vol 62 No 2 (2024) | |
| Section | Original Article(s) | |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.18502/acta.v62i2.17041 | |
| Keywords | ||
| Interdisciplinary teaching Collaborative teaching Reflection Reflexivity Medical sciences Medical education Distance education Medical journalism | ||
| Rights and permissions | |
|
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
