An Outdoor Educational Experience in Health Professions Education: Beyond a Focus Group Study
Abstract
Outdoor learning can relate students with environment, community, society and themselves. It can benefit students of all ages and successful in a variety of settings. Furthermore, it can enrich the curriculum and improve educational attainment. So, the present study has tried to explore experience of PhD candidates in Medical Education through a focus group. Data were collected from PhD students in medical education after participating in an outdoor session through a focus group which is frequently used as a qualitative approach to gain an in-depth understanding of social issues. Data were analyzed through conventional content analysis approach. Fifteen PhD candidates participated in focus group. Most of them aged above 35. The majority of them were working at Education Development Center (EDC), the rest were clinical practitioner, faculty member and people involved with educational activities. As to conventional content analysis of data, two main categories of instructional and inspirational sides of outdoor learning had emerged with three (Different physical space, Environmental distractors, and Innovative teaching method) and four subcategories (Informal communication, Attractive learning environment, inducing reflection, and making a new viewpoint) respectively. It is recommended to include the outdoor learning experience to provide situations for research and practice. It should be noted that curriculum reform might be necessary for planning the Outdoor learning environments and associated teaching learning methods.
2. Pretty J, Griffin M, Peacock J, Hine R, Sellens M, South N. “A Countryside for Health and Wellbeing: The Physical and Mental Health Benefits of Green Exercise”-Executive Summary. Countryside Recreation Network; 2005.
3. Rickinson M, Dillon J, Teamey K, Morris M, Choi MY, Sanders D, et al. A review of research on outdoor learning. National foundation for educational research and King’s college London. Field studies council; 2004.
4. What are the benefits? 2018. English outdoor council. (Accessed at https://www.englishoutdoorcouncil.org/outdoor-learning/what-are-the-benefits-of-outdoor-learning.)
5. Parrish D, Phillips G, Levine R, Hikawa H, Gaertner M, Agosta N, et al. Effects of outdoor education programs for children in California. American Institute For Research; 2005.
6. Konopacki JR. Outdoor education: the effects of outdoor learning on student success; 2016.
7. Ghazal N, Akl IB, Aoun R, Ziadeh N, Houranieh R, Khalil PB. An Internal Medicine Intern Retreat to Facilitate Transition to PGME and Promote Peer Interaction. J Grad Med Educ 2019;11:165-8.
8. Fuller IC. Taking students outdoors to learn in high places. Area 2012;44:7-13.
9. Beames S, Atencio M, Ross H. Taking excellence outdoors. Scottish Educ Rev 2009;41:32-45.
10. Nicol R, Higgins P, Ross H, Mannion G. Outdoor education in Scotland: A summary of recent research: Scottish Natural Heritage; 2008.
11. Committee S. House of Commons Education and skills Committee. Secondary Education: Schools Admission 4th Report, Session; 2004.
12. Taking learning outdoors partnerships for excellence; 2007.
13. Marchant E, Todd C, Cooksey R, Dredge S, Jones H, Reynolds D, et al. Curriculum-based outdoor learning for children aged 9-11: A qualitative analysis of pupils’ and teachers’ views. PloS one 2019;14:e0212242.
14. Cottrell JR, Cottrell SP. Outdoor skills education: what are the benefits for health, learning and lifestyle? World Leisure J 2020;62:219-41.
15. Barrable A, Touloumakos A, Lapere L. Exploring student teachers’ motivations and sources of confidence: The case of outdoor learning. European J Teach Educ 2022;45:356-72.
16. Education HIo. Improving Scottish education: a report by HMIE on inspection and review 2005-2008: HM Inspectorate of Education Livingston; 2009.
17. Mandal PC. Saturation in qualitative research: Considerations and limitations. Int J Acad Res Dev 2018;3:624-8.
18. Graneheim UH, Lundman B. Qualitative content analysis in nursing research: concepts, procedures and measures to achieve trustworthiness. Nurse Educ Today 2004;24:105-12.
19. López Alcarria A. Evaluación de la calidad de la ambientalización curricular en centros educativos andaluces: estudio de casos en la provincia de Granada ; 2016.
20. Wells NM, Evans GW, Cheek KA. Environmental psychology. Environmental health: From global to local. 2016;203.
21. Nordquist J, Hall J, Caverzagie K, Snell L, Chan MK, Thoma B, et al. The clinical learning environment. Med Teach 2019;41:366-72.
22. Dillon J, Rickinson M, Teamey K. The value of outdoor learning: evidence from research in the UK and elsewhere. Towards a Convergence Between Science and Environmental Education: Routledge; 2016:193-200.
23. Athman J, Monroe MC. The effects of environment-based education on students’ achievement motivation. J Interpretation Res 2004;9:9-25.
24. Bester L, Muller G, Munge B, Morse M, Meyers N. Those who teach learn: Near-peer teaching as outdoor environmental education curriculum and pedagogy. J Outdoor Environ Educ 2017;20:35-46.
25. Thomas GJ. Effective teaching and learning strategies in outdoor education: findings from two residential programmes based in Australia. J Adventure Educ Outdoor Learn 2019;19:242-55.
26. Erol T, GÜLEN S. Analysis of the influence of outdoor education activities on seventh grade students. Particip Educ Res 2019;6:122-43.
27. Povilaitis V, Riley M, DeLange R, Verkouw A, Macklin K, Hodge CJ. Instructor impacts on outdoor education participant outcomes: A systematic review. J Outdoor Recreation Educ Leadersh 2019;11:222-38
28. Ahoec. Benefits of outdoor learning; 2020. (Accessed at https://ahoec.org/benefits-of-outdoor-learning/.)
29. Britain G. Learning outside the classroom: How far should you go?: Ofsted; 2008.
30. Nordquist J, Sundberg K, Laing A. Aligning physical learning spaces with the curriculum: AMEE Guide No. 107. Med Teach 2016;38:755-68..
Files | ||
Issue | Vol 62 No 2 (2024) | |
Section | Original Article(s) | |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.18502/acta.v62i2.17039 | |
Keywords | ||
Focus group Medical education Outdoor learning Conventional content analysis Qualitative |
Rights and permissions | |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |