Exploring Themes in English Language Teaching Publications in Iran’s Medical Education: A Content Analysis
Abstract
The present study explored the trajectories of themes in the English for Medical Purposes (EMP) studies in the Iranian medical education context. Informed with the frameworks of language planning, it juxtaposed the extracted themes with the pillars of English for Specific Purposes (ESP)-needs analysis, learning objectives, materials and methods, and evaluation. It explored the EMP themes in a corpus of 41 documents extracted from Google Scholar, Scopus, ISI, and PubMed databases. Then, the researchers performed a content analysis of the corpus based on a matrix incorporating the title, abstract, introduction, discussion, keywords, and the field of expertise of the author(s) of the documents. The analysis revealed the themes of learners’ need analysis, language skills, learning strategies, cognitive and affective variables, teaching methodology, teaching materials, material evaluation, use of technology, evaluation of learners and learning, program evaluation, and evaluation of instructors. The juxtaposition of the themes with the mainstream pillars showed that although there was a match between the themes and the pillars, the size of the themes falling under each pillar differed. While utilizing technology and affective variables were the most frequent themes, learning materials, language skills, and learner variables were the least frequent ones. Most of the themes matched with the learning objectives pillar; the needs analysis pillar, on the other hand, had the fewest number of themes. Notable gaps, particularly in the areas of instructors' needs, administrative needs, learner variables, and instructor variables were discovered. The study also showed that EMP research predominantly focuses on English for medical academic purposes (EMAP) in the absence of studies on English for Medical Occupational Purposes (EMOP). The findings have implications for EMP research, policy setting, teacher education, and materials development, providing guidance for future research endeavors and contributing to the enhancement of English language education in the field of medical sciences.
2. Hutchinson T, Waters A. English for specific purposes: A Learner-Centered Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1987.
3. Paltridge B, Starfield S. The handbook of English for specific purposes. New York, United States: Wiley Online Library; 2013.
4. Brown JD. Introducing needs analysis and English for specific purposes. United Kingdom: Routledge; 2016.
5. Basturkmen H, Elder C. The practice of LSP. In: Davies A, Elder C. The handbook of applied linguistics. United States: Wiley Online Library 2004:672-94.
6. Belcher D. Considering what we know and need to know about second language writing. Appl Linguistics Rev 2012;3:131-50.
7. Blok S, Lockwood RB, Frendo E. The 6 Principles for Exemplary Teaching of English Learners®: Academic and Other Specific Purposes. The 6 Principles: ERIC; 2020.
8. Faraj BMA. English for medical education in EFL context. J Teach English Specific Acad Purposes 2015;3:121-48.
9. Creswell JW, Poth CN. Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. New York, United States: Sage publications; 2016.
10. Heming TA, Nandagopal S. Comparative difficulties with non-scientific general vocabulary and scientific/medical terminology in English as a second language (ESL) medical students. Sultan Qaboos Univ Med J 2012;12:485.
11. Milosavljević N, Vuletic A, Jovkovic L. Learning medical English: A prerequisite for successful academic and professional education. Srpski arhiv za celokupno lekarstvo 2015:143: 237-240.
12. Hwang Y, Lin S. A study of medical students’ linguistic needs in Taiwan. Asian ESP J 2010;6:35-58.
13. Ibrahim AI. ESP at the Tertiary Level: Current Situation, Application and Expectation. English Lang Teach 2010;3:200-4.
14. Atai MR, Nazari O. Exploring reading comprehension needs of Iranian EAP students of health information management (HIM): A triangulated approach. System 2011;39:30-43.
15. Atai MR, editor. EAP teacher education: Searching for an effective model integrating content and language teachers’ schemes. Proceedings of PAAL conference. Korea: Kangwong National University Chuncheon; 2006.
16. Tavakoli M, Tavakol M. Problematizing EAP education in Iran: A critical ethnographic study of educational, political, and sociocultural roots. J English Acad Purposes 2018;31:28-43.
17. Alemi M, Pazooki S. Evaluating Engineering Major ESP Courses in Iranian Universities: Stakeholders' Views on Course Effectiveness. Iran J English Acad Purposes 2021;10:88-101.
18. Tajeddin Z, Chamani F. Foreign language education policy (FLEP) in Iran: Unpacking state mandates in major national policy documents. JTLS 2020;39:185-215
19. Kaplan RB, Baldauf RB. Language planning: From practice to theory. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters; 1997.
20. Sadeghi K, Richards JC. Teaching spoken English in Iran’s private language schools: Issues and options. English Teach 2015;14:210-34.
21. Davari H, Aghagolzadeh F. To teach or not to teach? Still an open question for the Iranian education system. English language teaching in the Islamic Republic of Iran: Innovations, trends and challenges 2015:13-9.
22. Basu M. Importance of research in education. (Accessed 19 Nov, 2020, at SSRN 3703560.)
23. McIntyre DI. The contribution of research to quality in teacher education. The South Pacific J Teach Educ 1980;8:4-19.
24. Anthony L. Introducing English for specific purposes. United Kingdom: Routledge; 2018.
25. Krippendorff K. Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage; 1980.
26. Bowen GA. Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qual Res J 2009;9:27-40.
27. Krippendorff, K. Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology (2nd ed.) Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications; 2004.
28. Kaplan RB, Baldauf JRB. Language-in-education policy and planning. In: Hinkel E, editor. Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning Mahwah. NJ: L. Erlbaum Associates; 2005:1013-34.
29. Kaplan RB, Baldauf RB. Language and Language-in-Education Planning in the Pacific Basin. Dordrecht: Kluwer; 2003.
30. Çakmak F, Ismail SM, Karami S. Advancing learning-oriented assessment (LOA): mapping the role of self-assessment, academic resilience, academic motivation in students’ test-taking skills, and test anxiety management in Telegram-assisted-language learning. Lang Test Asia 2023;13:20.
31. Alizadeh I. Exploring language learners’ perception of the effectiveness of an English Language Teaching (ELT) program in Iran. Cogent Educ 2018;5:1553652.
32. Alizadeh I. Challenges of employing e-learning for teaching language: A case of teaching English in Iran. E-Learning Digit Media 2012;9:426-38.
33. Alizadeh I. Using an LMS in teaching English: A qualitative content analysis of medical sciences students' evaluations and suggestions. Qual Rep 2019;24:2851-73.
34. Alizadeh I, Darvishpour A. Using Metaphors to Explore Iranian Medical Sciences Students' Conceptions of Learning English. J Cogn Sci 2021;22.
35. Karami S, Riasati MJ. A study of electronic dictionary use and attitudes among Iranian students of translation during Covid-19 pandemic. Educ Res Int 2023;1-9.
36. Alizadeh I, Ebrahimi F. Investigating medical students’ readiness for technology-mediated autonomous learning situations in ESP programs. Educ Inf Technol 2019;24:3289-309.
37. Dudley-Evans T, St John MJ. Developments in English for specific purposes: A multi-disciplinary approach: Cambridge university press; 1998.
38. Ramírez CG. English for specific purposes: Brief history and definitions. Revista de Lenguas Modernas 2015.
39. Woodrow L. Introducing researching English for specific purposes. United Kingdom: Taylor & Francis; 2022.
40. Smoak R. What is English for specific purposes. English Teaching Forum; 2003.
41. Ahmed MK. The ESP Teacher: Issues, Tasks and Challenges. English Specific Purposes World 2014;42:1-33.
42. Bastürkmen H, Bocanegra-Valle A. Materials design processes, beliefs and practices of experienced ESP teachers in university settings in Spain. In: Kırkgöz Y, Dikilitaş K, Eds. Key issues in English for Specific Purposes in higher education. Springer; 2018:13-27.
43. Pourhaji M, Sajjadi S, Moghaddam MS, Shabani E. Current Status of English Instruction at Medical Universities in Iran: Zooming in on Teachers. Arch Adv Biosci 2023;14:1-6.
44. Sezer S. An investigation of occupational English language needs of Turkish police officers [dissertation]. Turkey: Bilkent Universitesi; 2004.
45. Kalpana R, Sankar G. Development of test items for technical and general English language with specific reference to knowledge domain of bloom’s taxonomy. International Journal of Linguistics Literature and Culture 2017;3(1):39-46.
46. Kim H. Needs Analysis for English for Specific Purpose course Development for Engineering Students in Korea. Int J Multimedia Ubiquitous Eng 2013;8:279-88.
47. Dovey T. What purposes, specifically? Re-thinking purposes and specificity in the context of the ‘new vocationalism’. English specific purpose 2006;25:387-402.
| Files | ||
| Issue | Vol 62 No 3 (2024) | |
| Section | Original Articles | |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.18502/acta.v62i3.17117 | |
| Keywords | ||
| English for medical purposes (EMP) Medical education Medical sciences universities English for specific purposes (ESP) English for academic medical purposes (EAMP) English for medical occupational purposes (EMOP) | ||
| Rights and permissions | |
|
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
