Original Articles

Comparison of Post-Removal Complications of Chest Tube Extraction at 48 Versus 72 Hours After Insertion in Trauma Patients

Abstract

Pneumothorax is one of the most common consequences of chest trauma, typically managed with chest tube insertion. However, the optimal timing for chest tube removal remains controversial. This study aimed to compare the incidence of clinical complications following chest tube removal at 48 hours versus 72 hours after insertion in trauma patients admitted to Sina Hospital. This prospective, single-center, parallel-group randomized controlled trial enrolled 194 trauma patients requiring tube thoracostomy. Participants were randomized in a 1:1 ratio using computer-generated block randomization with allocation concealment into two groups: removal at 48 hours (n=97) and removal at 72 hours (n=97). The primary endpoint was post-removal complications, defined as recurrent pneumothorax or incomplete lung re-expansion confirmed radiographically. Absolute risk differences (ARD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated. Logistic regression analysis was performed to evaluate potential predictors of complications. Statistical significance was defined as P<0.05. The mean age of patients was 43.27±13.05 years. The 72-hour group had slightly higher mean oxygen saturation than the 48-hour group (94.89% vs. 94.76%, P=0.690), and higher mean heart rate (84.04 vs. 83.11, P=0.507) and respiratory rate (13.44 vs. 13.38, P=0.822). In contrast, mean pain intensity was higher in the 48-hour group (4.03 vs. 3.98, P=0.673). Recurrent pneumothorax occurred in 12 patients (12.4%) in the 48-hour group and 10 patients (10.3%) in the 72-hour group (ARD: 2.1%; 95% CI: −6.8% to 11.0%; P=0.651). Incomplete lung re-expansion occurred in 2 patients (2.1%) and 4 patients (4.1%), respectively (ARD: −2.0%; 95% CI: −6.7% to 2.7%; P=0.407). No statistically significant differences were detected between groups. Logistic regression analysis did not identify independent predictors of post-removal complications. Chest tube removal at 48 hours was not associated with a statistically significant increase in post-removal complications compared with removal at 72 hours. However, confidence intervals were wide, and the findings should be interpreted cautiously pending confirmation in larger adequately powered studies.

1. Iqbal Y, Taj MN, Ahmed A, Rehman ZU, Akbar Z. Validity of the fast scan for diagnosis of intraabdominal injury in blunt abdominal trauma. J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad 2014;26:52-6.
2. Rouhani Z, Narouei B, Teymouri MA, Sheykhzadeh A, Ghasemirad M, Mohebi F, et al. Comparison of Sensitivity and Specificity of Sonography with CT Scan in the Diagnosis of Abdominal Free Fluid in Blunt Abdominal Trauma in Khatamol-Anbia Hospital, Zahedan 2009.
3. Porseyyedi B, Khoshab H, Kashani M, Saeedinejad Z. Evaluation of the Effect of Prophylactic Antibiotics in the Prognoses of Patients with Chest Tube after Penetrating Chest Trauma Refferring to the Emergency Wards (2011). J Rafsanjan Univ Med Sci 2013;12:243-50.
4. Bailey R. Complications of tube thoracostomy in trauma. Emerg Med J 2000;17:111-4.
5. Pompili C, Salati M, Brunelli A. Chest tube management after surgery for pneumothorax. Thorac Surg Clin 2017;27:25-8.
6. Paydar S, Ghahramani Z, Johari HG, Khezri S, Ziaeian B, Ghayyoumi MA, et al. Tube thoracostomy (chest tube) removal in traumatic patients: what do we know? What can we do? Bull Emerg Trauma 2015;3:37.
7. Patel BH, Lew CO, Dall T, Anderson CL, Rodriguez R, Langdorf MI. Chest tube output, duration, and length of stay are similar for pneumothorax and hemothorax seen only on computed tomography vs chest radiograph. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg 2021;47:939-47.
8. Kong V, Cheung C, Rajaretnam N, Sarvepalli R, Weale R, Varghese C, et al. Recurrent pneumothorax following chest tube removal in thoracic stab wounds: a comparative study between end inspiratory versus end expiratory removal techniques at a major trauma centre in South Africa. ANZ J Surg 2021;91:658-61.
9. Kong V, Ko J, Cheung C, Lee H, He R, Wang J, et al. Optimal timing of chest radiograph following chest tube removal in detecting recurrent pneumothorax: analysis of 163 patients with thoracic stab wounds at a major trauma centre in South Africa. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 2025.
10. Abdulrahman Y, Al-Ani M, Farhat M, Khallafalla H, Abu Amr A, Ajaj A, et al. Implementing a chest tube removal protocol in patients with thoracic trauma: a prospective clinical study. J Thorac Dis 2025;17:1301-11.
11. Çobanoğlu U, Melek M, Edirne Y, Mergan D. Removal of chest tubes: a prospective randomized study. Turk J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2011;19:593-7.
12. Amin MR, Siratinayer M, Abadi A, Moradyan T. Correlation between visual analogue scale and short form of McGill questionnaire in patients with chronic low back pain 2012.
13. El-Faramawy A, Jabbour G, Afifi I, Abdelrahman H, Qabbani AS, Al Nobani M, et al. Complications following chest tube insertion pre- and post-implementation of guidelines in patients with chest trauma: a retrospective, observational study. Int J Crit Illn Inj Sci 2020;10:189-94.
14. Abbasi HR, Farrokhnia S, Sefidbakht S, Paydar S, Bolandparvaz S. Chest tube removal time in trauma patients on positive ventilation pressure: a randomized clinical trial. Bull Emerg Trauma 2013;1:17-21
Files
IssueVol 64 No 5 (2026) QRcode
SectionOriginal Articles
Keywords
Chest tube Pneumothorax Trauma Removal timing Complications Lung re-expansion
Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
1.
Hoseinzadeh Fumeshi A, Miratashi Yazdi SA, Asefi H. Comparison of Post-Removal Complications of Chest Tube Extraction at 48 Versus 72 Hours After Insertion in Trauma Patients. Acta Med Iran. 2026;65(5).