Ultrasound-Guided Peripheral Intravenous Catheterization in Patients With Difficult Venous Access: A Comparative Study of Antecubital Versus Saphenous Veins
Abstract
Establishing reliable intravenous access in patients with difficult peripheral veins is a common challenge in perioperative care. In such cases, central venous catheterization (CVC) is often used despite its invasive nature and associated risks. For short elective procedures, this may be excessive. Ultrasound-guided peripheral vein catheterization (US-PVC) has emerged as a safer, less invasive alternative that improves success rates. However, limited evidence exists comparing different anatomical sites for US-PVC in this population. This study aims to compare the efficacy and complication rates of ultrasound-guided IV access in the antecubital versus saphenous regions in adult surgical patients with difficult venous access. This single-center, parallel-group, randomized clinical trial was conducted on adult patients undergoing elective surgery with difficult peripheral venous access. Patients were randomized to receive US-guided catheterization in either the antecubital (Group A) or saphenous (Group B) region. All procedures were performed by an anesthesiologist experienced in ultrasound-guided vascular access. Primary outcomes included first-attempt success rate and catheterization time; secondary outcomes included complication rates and patient-reported satisfaction. Follow-up assessments were conducted at 24 hours and 72 hours post-procedure. The saphenous group demonstrated significantly higher first-attempt success rates (53.1% vs. 44.9%, P=0.04) and greater catheter durability (89.8% vs. 75.6%, P=0.03). However, this group also reported significantly more procedural pain based on VAS scores (4.94 vs. 2.24, P<0.001), as well as greater increases in mean arterial pressure and heart rate. Although complication rates such as hematoma and thrombophlebitis were slightly higher in the antecubital group, the differences were not statistically significant. Patient satisfaction was significantly higher in the saphenous group (95.8% vs. 77.6%, P=0.001), while staff satisfaction did not differ meaningfully between groups. Ultrasound-guided IV catheterization in both antecubital and saphenous regions is effective in patients with difficult venous access. The saphenous site offers higher first-attempt success and catheter longevity but is associated with more discomfort. These findings may aid anesthesiologists in selecting optimal access sites based on clinical needs and patient tolerance. This study was approved by the Tehran University of Medical Sciences Ethics Committee (Ethics Code: IR.TUMS.IKHC.REC.1402.418, IRCT Id: IRCT20230130057273N2).
2. Webster J, Osborne S, Rickard CM, Marsh N. Clinically-indicated replacement versus routine replacement of peripheral venous catheters. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2019;1.
3. Van Loon F, Buise M, Claassen J, Dierick-van Daele A, Bouwman A. Comparison of ultrasound guidance with palpation and direct visualisation for peripheral vein cannulation in adult patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Anaesth 2018;121:358-66.
4. Zingg W, Pittet D. Peripheral venous catheters: an under-evaluated problem. Int J Antimicrob Agents 2009;34:S38-42.
5. Presley B, Isenberg JD. Ultrasound-guided intravenous access. In: StatPearls. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2023.
6. Hoskins MJ, Nolan BC, Evans KL, Phillips B. Educating health professionals in ultrasound guided peripheral intravenous cannulation: A systematic review of teaching methods, competence assessment, and patient outcomes. Medicine (Baltimore) 2023;102:e33624.
7. Liu YT, Alsaawi A, Bjornsson HM. Ultrasound-guided peripheral venous access: a systematic review of randomized-controlled trials. Eur J Emerg Med 2014;21:18-23.
8. Jacobson AF, Winslow EH. Variables influencing intravenous catheter insertion difficulty and failure: an analysis of 339 intravenous catheter insertions. Heart Lung 2005;34:345-59.
9. Bauman M, Braude D, Crandall C. Ultrasound-guidance vs standard technique in difficult vascular access patients by ED technicians. Am J Emerg Med 2009;27:135-40.
10. Heinrichs J, Fritze Z, Vandermeer B, Klassen T, Curtis S. Ultrasonographically guided peripheral intravenous cannulation of children and adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Emerg Med 2013;61:444-54.e1.
11. Fields JM, Piela NE, Au AK, Ku BS. Risk factors associated with difficult venous access in adult ED patients. Am J Emerg Med 2014;32:1179-82.
12. Schoenfeld E, Shokoohi H, Boniface K. Ultrasound-guided peripheral intravenous access in the emergency department: patient-centered survey. West J Emerg Med 2011;12:475.
13. Tobias JD. The safety of invasive monitoring in infants and children: complications of central venous access. Anaesth Pain Intensive Care 2019;23:3-7.
14. Witting MD, Schenkel SM, Lawner BJ, Euerle BD. Effects of vein width and depth on ultrasound-guided peripheral intravenous success rates. J Emerg Med 2010;39:70-5.
15. Xiong X, Xiong Y, Liu G. Systematic review and meta-analysis: safety of ultrasound-guided peripheral venipuncture and catheterization. Ann Palliat Med 2021;10:11721-11732.
16. Stolz LA, Stolz U, Howe C, Farrell IJ, Adhikari S. Ultrasound-guided peripheral venous access: a meta-analysis and systematic review. J Vasc Access 2015;16:321-6.
17. Triffterer L, Marhofer P, Willschke H, Machata A, Reichel G, Benkoe T, et al. Ultrasound-guided cannulation of the great saphenous vein at the ankle in infants. Br J Anaesth 2012;108:290-4.
18. Vinograd AM, Zorc JJ, Dean AJ, Abbadessa MKF, Chen AE. First-attempt success, longevity, and complication rates of ultrasound-guided peripheral intravenous catheters in children. Pediatr Emerg Care 2018;34:376-80.
19. Stein J, George B, River G, Hebig A, McDermott D. Ultrasonographically guided peripheral intravenous cannulation in emergency department patients with difficult intravenous access: a randomized trial. Ann Emerg Med 2009;54:33-40.
20. Benkhadra M, Collignon M, Fournel I, Oeuvrard C, Rollin P, Perrin M, et al. Ultrasound guidance allows faster peripheral IV cannulation in children under 3 years of age with difficult venous access: a prospective randomized study. Paediatr Anaesth 2012;22:449-54.
21. Salleras-Duran L, Fuentes-Pumarola C, Fontova-Almató A, Roqueta-Vall-Llosera M, Cámara-Liebana D, Ballester-Ferrando D. Pain and satisfaction perceptions of ultrasound-guided versus conventional peripheral intravenous catheterization: a randomized controlled trial. Pain Manag Nurs 2024;25:e37-e44.
22. Tran QK, Fairchild M, Yardi I, Mirda D, Markin K, Pourmand A. Efficacy of ultrasound-guided peripheral intravenous cannulation versus standard of care: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ultrasound Med Biol 2021;47:3068-78.
23. Davis EM, Feinsmith S, Amick AE, Sell J, McDonald V, Trinquero P, et al. Difficult intravenous access in the emergency department: performance and impact of ultrasound-guided IV insertion performed by nurses. Am J Emerg Med 2021;46:539-44.
24. Tran QK, Flanagan K, Fairchild M, Yardi I, Pourmand A. Nurses and efficacy of ultrasound-guided versus traditional venous access: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Emerg Nurs 2022;48:145-58.e1.
25. Chen Q, Long Q, Liang JQ, Tang TX, Yang B. Comparative evaluation of the clinical safety and efficiency of supraclavicular and infraclavicular approaches for subclavian venous catheterization in adults: a meta-analysis. Am J Emerg Med 2020;38:1475-80.
| Files | ||
| Issue | Vol 64 No 3 (2026) | |
| Section | Original Articles | |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.18502/acta.v64i3.21538 | |
| Keywords | ||
| Ultrasound-Guided Catheterization Peripheral Vein Access. Antecubital Vein Saphenous Vein Vascular Access Techniques | ||
| Rights and permissions | |
|
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |


