Comparison of Fibrinogen/Albumin Ratio Between Women With Recurrent Pregnancy Loss and Those With First-Time Miscarriage
Abstract
The fibrinogen/albumin ratio (FAR) serves as a valuable marker of systemic inflammation and coagulation. However, its capacity to distinguish patients with recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL) from those experiencing a first-time spontaneous miscarriage has yet to be established. This study aimed to compare FAR levels between women with RPL and those who underwent a first-trimester miscarriage, as well as to assess the discriminative performance of FAR using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. In this cross-sectional, diagnostic-comparison study, 120 women in their first trimester were enrolled and divided into three groups: RPL, first-time miscarriage, and healthy early pregnancy (n=40 per group). Plasma fibrinogen and serum albumin levels were measured, and the FAR was calculated. Differences between the groups were analyzed using appropriate parametric or nonparametric methods. Subsequently, ROC analysis was performed to evaluate the area under the curve (AUC), optimal cut-off points (via the Youden index), sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV). Women with RPL, compared with healthy pregnant controls, were characterized by significantly elevated fibrinogen (403.50±15.62 mg/dL vs 307.25±45.35 mg/dL), decreased albumin (332.25±32.78 mg/dL vs 376.25±44.36 mg/dL), and markedly increased FAR levels (1.2425±0.0699 vs 0.8289±0.1566) (all P<0.001). Compared with the first-time miscarriage group, the RPL group also showed higher fibrinogen (403.50±15.62 mg/dL vs 354.75±28.99 mg/dL), lower albumin (332.25±32.78 mg/dL vs 345.50±39.68 mg/dL), and higher FAR (1.2425±0.0699 vs 1.0434±0.1023) (P≤0.002). ROC analysis identified an FAR cut-off value of 0.975 for discriminating between RPL and healthy pregnancy (AUC=0.875; sensitivity 82.5%; specificity 87.5%) and 1.083 for discriminating between RPL and first-time miscarriage (AUC=0.777; sensitivity 57.5%; specificity 65.0%). FAR is significantly elevated in women with RPL and strongly discriminates between RPL and healthy early pregnancy. It moderately discriminates between RPL and first-time miscarriage, suggesting that it could be useful as a screening/stratification biomarker but should not be used as a single diagnostic test for distinguishing between miscarriage subtypes. External multicenter validation, harmonized assay methods, and incorporation of FAR into multimarker predictive models are recommended prior to clinical implementation.
2. ESHRE Guideline Development Group on RPL. Guideline on the management of recurrent pregnancy loss. European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology (ESHRE). Issued 2022/2023.
3. El Hachem H, Crepaux V, May-Panloup P, Descamps P, Legendre G, Bouet PE. Recurrent pregnancy loss: current perspectives. Int J Womens Health 2017;9:331-45.
4. Mor G, Cardenas I. The role of the immune system at the implantation site. Ann N Y Acad Sci 2011;1221:80-7.
5. Christiansen OB. Inflammation and miscarriage. Hum Reprod Update 2006;12:667-77.
6. Vesce F, Battisti C, Crudo M. The inflammatory cytokine imbalance for miscarriage and early pregnancy loss: a review. Front Immunol 2022;13:861245.
7. Soma-Pillay P, Nelson-Piercy C, Tolppanen H, Mebazaa A. Physiological changes in pregnancy: implications for clinical care. Cardiovasc J Afr 2016;27:89-94.
8. Gulhar R, Ashraf MA, Jialal I. Acute phase reactants. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2023.
9. Jiang L, Du Y, Lu Y, Wu X, Tong X. Monitoring of hemostatic parameters for early prediction of first-trimester miscarriage. Biomarkers 2021;26:532-8.
10. Usta CS, Atik TK, Ozcaglayan R, Bulbul CB, Camili FE, Adali E. Does the fibrinogen/albumin ratio predict the prognosis of pregnancies with abortus imminens? Saudi Med J 2021;42:255-63.
11. Cimsir MT, Yildiz MS. Could fibrinogen to albumin ratio be a predictive marker for recurrent pregnancy loss? Int J Clin Pract 2021;75:e14520.
12. Wang Y, Zhang H, Zhang C. Fibrinogen-to-albumin ratio and clinical outcomes: mechanistic overview and correlations in vascular disease. J Am Heart Assoc 2023;12:e030837.
13. Ulloque-Badaracco JR, Alarcón-Braga EA, Hernandez-Bustamante EA, et al. Fibrinogen-to-albumin ratio and blood urea nitrogen-to-albumin ratio in COVID-19 patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Trop Med Infect Dis 2022;7:150.
14. Ren H, Liu W, Niu A, Zhao X. Fibrinogen to albumin ratio, a novel serum indicator for evaluating the severity of preeclampsia: a single-center retrospective study. Medicine (Baltimore) 2023;102:e33419.
15. Tomkiewicz J, Darmochwał-Kolarz D, Kolarz B, et al. The diagnostics and treatment of recurrent pregnancy loss: comparative guideline review and research priorities. J Clin Med 2023;12:4768.
16. Abdulla TN, Abid SJ, Ahmed AI. Fibrinogen/albumin ratio in women with recurrent pregnancy loss [unpublished dataset]. Baghdad: Al-Elwiya Maternity Teaching Hospital; 2023–2024.
17. Hung KC, Ko CC, Wang LK, Liu PH, Chen IW, Huang YT, et al. Association between fibrinogen-to-albumin ratio and prognosis of hospitalized patients with COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Diagnostics (Basel) 2022;12:1678.
18. Li B, Deng H, Lei B, Chen L, Zhang X, Sha D. The prognostic value of fibrinogen to albumin ratio in malignant tumor patients: a meta-analysis. Front Oncol 2022;12:985377.
19. Yin XJ, Hong W, Tian FJ, Li XC. Proteomic analysis of decidua in patients with recurrent pregnancy loss reveals mitochondrial oxidative-stress dysfunction. Clin Proteomics 2021;18:9.
20. Yao H, Ji Y, Zhou Y. Analysis of blood coagulation indexes, thromboelastogram and autoantibodies in patients with recurrent pregnancy loss. Pak J Med Sci 2022;38:2005-10.
21. Turesheva A, Zuzovska S, Ukybassova T, Marat A, Kanabekova P, Kaldygulova L, et al. Recurrent pregnancy loss: etiology, risk factors, diagnostic options and management—a comprehensive review. J Clin Med 2023;12:4074.
22. Davalieva K, Kocarev D, Plaseska-Karanfilska D. Decoding recurrent pregnancy loss: insights from comparative proteomics studies. Biol Reprod 2025;112:1-17.
23. Liu K, Xu X, Sun L, Li H, Jin Y, Ma X, et al. Proteomics profiling reveals lipid metabolism abnormalities during oogenesis in unexplained recurrent pregnancy loss. Front Immunol 2024;15:1397633.
24. Toth E, Posta M, Györffy D, Oravecz O, Farkas E, Balogh A, et al. Novel proteomics biomarkers of recurrent pregnancy loss: integrative analyses. Front Immunol 2025:16:1621168.
25. Hovine A, Chauleur C, Gauld C, Rancon F, Gris JC, Tardy B, et al. Serum D-dimer is not predictive of placenta-mediated complications in pregnancy at high risk: the multicentric prospective AngioPred cohort. Front Cell Dev Biol 2023;11:1115622.
26. Garrido-Gimenez C, Alijotas-Reig J. Recurrent miscarriage: causes, evaluation and management. Postgrad Med J 2015;91:151-62.
27. Shirzadi M, Radfar AH, Dehghani M. Recurrent miscarriage in a woman with congenital factor V deficiency: a case report. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2022;22:915.
| Files | ||
| Issue | Vol 64 No 6 (2026) | |
| Section | Original Articles | |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.18502/acta.v64i6.22341 | |
| Keywords | ||
| Fibrinogen/albumin ratio The fibrinogen/albumin ratio (FAR) Recurrent pregnancy loss Miscarriage Biomarkers ROC analysis Inflammation Coagulation | ||
| Rights and permissions | |
|
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |


