Post Operative Voiding Efficacy after Anterior Colporrhaphy
Abstract
The aim of this study was to determine the most effective and suitable time to remove the urinary catheter (Foley) after anterior and posterior colporrhaphy surgery. Patients who experience anterior Colporrhaphy operation for genuine stress incontinency or pelvic organ prolapsed will have post operative voiding dysfunction. These patients need postoperative drainage. One of the methods preferred for this purpose is to apply Foley Catheter, but there is no particular regimen available for the exact time of catheter removal in these patients. We have tried to find out the best timeto remove Foley catheter after which the repeated Foley catheter is not required or minimized. One hundred and eighty nine patients who have been undergone Colporrhaphy have been selected randomly and divided into three groups' as 1, 2 and 4 days of catheter removal. The number of patients in each group was 62, 63 and 64 respectively. In all three groups, before removing urinary catheter, it was clamped every 4 hrs, for 3 times. After removing of Foley, the patients were guided for urination; the voiding and residual volume was measured. In the patients with an increase of residual volume, the repeated Foley requirement was increased. However, 5.6 % of the patients with residual volume of ≤ 33 percent and 23.9% of the patients with residual volume between 33 to 68 percent, and finally 64.8% of the patients with residual volume of ≥ 68% had repeated Foley insertion. When considering the number of days, 85, 65 and 35.7 percent of the patients needed repeated Foley after 1, 2, and 4 days of catheter removal respectively. Interestingly, in the third group ( 4 days of the catheter removal ) with residual volume of ≤ 33% the repeated Foley requirement was nil, with no increase risk of urinary infection. We suggest that the best time to remove the urinary Foley catheter after anterior and posterior Colporrhaphy is the day four.
Karram MM, Walters MD. Urogynecology and Reconstructive Pelvic Surger. 2nd ed. St. Louis: Mosby; 1999.
Rock JA, Thompson JD, editors. TeLinde's Operative Gynecology.8th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven; 1997
Ostergard DR, Bent AE, editors. Urogynecology and Urodynamics: Theory and Practice. 4th ed. Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins; 1996.
Gandhi S, Beaumont JL, Goldberg RP, Kwon C, Abramov Y, Sand PK. Foley versus intermittent self-catheterization after transvaginal sling surgery: which works best? Urology 2004;64(1):53-7.
Sze EH, Miklos JR, Karram MM. Voiding after Burch colposuspension and effects of concomitant pelvic surgery: correlation with preoperative voiding mechanism. Obstet Gynecol 1996;88(4 Pt 1):564-7.
Bergman A, Bhatia NN. Uroflowmetry for predicting postoperative voiding difficulties in women with stress urinary incontinence. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1985;92(8):835-8.
Kleeman S, Goldwasser S, Vassallo B, Karram M. Predicting postoperative voiding efficiency after operation for incontinence and prolapse. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2002;187(1):49-52.
Kobak WH, Walters MD, Piedmonte MR. Determinants of voiding after three types of incontinence surgery: a multivariable analysis. Obstet Gynecol 2001;97(1):86-91.
Kobak WH, Walters MD, Piedmonte MR. Determinants of voiding after three types of incontinence surgery: a multivariable analysis. Obstet Gynecol 2001;97(1):86-91.
Bhatia NN, Bergman A. Urodynamic predictability of voiding following incontinence surgery. Obstet Gynecol 1984;63(1):85-91.
Files | ||
Issue | Vol 48, No 1 (2010) | |
Section | Original Article(s) | |
Keywords | ||
Urinary incontinence stress uniration |
Rights and permissions | |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |