Learning Outcomes in Two Different Teaching Approach in Nursing Education in Iran: E-Learning versus Lecture
Traditional teaching methods used in medical education couldn't meet the need for keeping pace with up to date information. Present study has conducted in order to compare the effect of lecture and e-learning methods on nursing students' learning outcomes in the context of Iran. A cross-over design was applied. Study sample was consisted of 32 students which were in third semester of nursing bachelor program and were passing Maternal Child nursing course. The first part of the course was taught using lecture method during first four weeks; an e-learning method was the technique used to educate the remained part of the course during the second four weeks. Students' learning outcomes in each method, opinion toward and participation with both educational methods was assessed. No significant difference was found between students exam scores in both methods. Considering students' opinion toward educational methods, no significant difference was found between two methods in general but students reported better "capability" and "independency" in e-learning method while lecture was obtained higher scores in "effectiveness on learning" and "motivation" characteristics. E-learning can be used in teaching some nursing courses. It is recommended to use e-learning method with appropriate interactive strategies and attractive virtual environments to motivate students.
Jeffries PR. Technology Trends in Nursing Education: Next Steps. Guest Editorial 2005;44(1):3-4.
Fry K. E-learning markets and providers: some issues and prospects. Education Training 2001;43(4/5):233-9.
Mehrdad N, Salsali M, Kazemnejad A. Iranian nurses' attitudes toward research utilization. J Res Nurs 2008;13(1):53-65.
Pinto A, Selvaggi S, Sicignano G, Vollono E, Iervolino L, Amato F, Molinari A, Grassi R. E-learning tools for education: regulatory aspects, current applications in radiology and future prospects. Radiol Med 2008;113(1):144-57.
Atack L. Becoming a web-based learner: registered nurses' experiences. J Adv Nurs 2003;44(3):289-97.
Carnwell R. Pedagogical implications of approaches to study in distance learning: developing models through qualitative and quantitative analysis. J Adv Nurs 2000;31(5):1018-28.
Forman D, Nyatanga L, Rich T. E-learning and educational diversity. Nurse Educ Today 2002;22(1):76- 82; discussion 83-4.
Reime MH, Harris A, Aksnes J, Mikkelsen J. The most successful method in teaching nursing students infection control - E-learning or lecture? Nurse Educ Today 2008;28(7):798-806.
Haigh J. Information technology in health professional education: why IT matters. Nurse Educ Today 2004;24(7):547-52.
Reece I, Walker S. Teaching Training and Learning: A Practical Guide. Durham, NC: Duke University Press; 2001.
Yu S, Chen IJ, Yang KF, Wang TF, Yen LL. A feasibility study on the adoption of e-learning for public health nurse continuing education in Taiwan. Nurse Educ Today 2007;27(7):755-61. Epub 2006 Dec 18.
Anderson ET, Mercer ZB. Impact of community health content on nurse practitioner practice: a comparison of classroom and web-based teaching. Nurs Educ Perspect 2004;25(4):171-5.
Umamaheswari R. E-learning Versus Classroom Learning. [Online] [cited 2011 Apr 15]; Available from: URL:http://www.chillibreeze.com/articles/ElearningversusClassroomLearning.asp
Ruiz JG, Mintzer MJ, Leipzig RM. The impact of Elearning in medical education. Acad Med 2006;81(3):207-12.
E-Learning Campus, University of Tehran. History of electronic education in Tehran University. [Online] 2011 [cited 2011 Apr 15] Available from: URL:http://utec.ut.ac.ir/web/utec/45
Khatony A, Nayery ND, Ahmadi F, Haghani H, Vehvilainen-Julkunen K. The effectiveness of web-based and face-to-face continuing education methods on nurses' knowledge about AIDS: a comparative study. BMC Med Educ 20090;9:41.
Polit DF, Beck CT. Nursing Research, Principles and Methods. 7th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins; 2004.
Schmidt K. Classroom action research: A case study assessing students' perceptions and learning outcomes of classroom teaching versus on-line teaching. J Indust Teach Educ 2002;40(1):45-59.
Gery W, Ryan H. Russell bernard techniques to identify themes. Field Methods 2003;15(1):85-109.
Rokni MB. E-learning in Type 1 Medical Universities of Iran. Turkish Online J Distance Educ 2005;6(3):1-9.
Frith KH, Kee CC. The effect of communication on nursing student outcomes in a Web-based course. J Nurs Educ 2003;42(8):350-8.
Thiele JE. Learning patterns of online students. J Nurs Educ 2003;42(8):364-6.
Buckley KM. Evaluation of classroom-based, Webenhanced, and Web-based distance learning nutrition courses for undergraduate nursing. J Nurs Educ 2003;42(8):367-70.
Woo MA, Kimmick JV. Comparison of Internet versus lecture instructional methods for teaching nursing research. J Prof Nurs 2000;16(3):132-9.
Cook G, Thynne E, Weatherhead E, Glenn S, Mitchell A, Bailey P. Distance learning in post-qualifying nurse education. Nurse Educ Today 2004;24(4):269-76.
Taylor JH. Facilitating distance learning in nurse education. Nurs Educ Pract 2003;3(1):23-9.
Billings DM, Connors HR, Skiba DJ. Benchmarking bestpractices in Web-based nursing courses. ANS Adv Nurs Sci 2001;23(3):41-52.
Shuster GF, Learn CD, Duncan R. A strategy for involving on-campus and distance students in a nursing research course. J Contin Educ Nurs 2003;34(3):108-15.
|Issue||Vol 49, No 5 (2011)|
|Lecture E–learning Learning outcome Students nursing|
|Rights and permissions|
|This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.|