Medical Students' Viewpoint Regarding the Integrated Module of Basal Ganglia
Integration is an important educational strategy in medical education. Considering this idea, the goal of the present study was to design and implementation of longitudinal and vertical integrated education of anatomy, physiology, pharmacology, neurology and neuropsychiatry subjects of brain's basal ganglia by a multidisciplinary team. Kern's approach to curriculum development was used. Participants were 20 medical students at basic science level who contribute in a 10 stations of pre-test exam at Medical School's Skill Lab. After the implementation of the module by a multidisciplinary team, post-test were done. A structured questionnaire was designed to assess student opinions about adequacy, usefulness of the module using a Likert scale with 5 categories ranging from “completely agreement” to “completely disagreement". The result of pre and post-test were also compared. Twenty questionnaires were completed, giving a 77.63% satisfaction rate. Seventy-five percent of students found it useful and appropriate at basic science level. About fifty percent of students suggested the implementation of this module for other medical students. The score of post-test was significantly (14.52±0.47 vs 6.32±0.62, P<0.05) higher than pre-test results. The viewpoints of medical students were positive and they value the module highly. Since it is not easy to change the style we teach, these results suggest necessitate of supporting the faculty member's participation in these modules.
Harden RM. The integration ladder: a tool for curriculum planning and evaluation. Med Educ 2000;34(7):551-7.
Li LM, Tang JL, Lv J, Jiang Y, Griffiths SM. The need for integration in health sciences sets the future direction for public health education. Public Health 2011;125(1):20-4.
McGrath BP, Graham IS, Crotty BJ, Jolly BC. Lack ofintegration of medical education in Australia: the need for change. Med J Aust 2006;184(7):346-8.
Case R. The anatomy of curriculum integration. Canadian J Educ 1994;16(2):215-4.
Dent JA, Harden RM, editors. A Practical Guide for Medical Teachers. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone;2001.
Snyman WD, Kroon J. Vertical and horizontal integration of knowledge and skills: a working model. Eur J Dent Educ 2005;9(1):26-31.
Silverthorn DU, Thorn PM, Svinicki MD. It's difficult to change the way we teach: lessons from the Integrative Themes in Physiology curriculum module project. Adv Physiol Educ 2006;30:204-14.
Engelberg J. Integrative physiology: some texts and methods of integrative study. Am J Physiol 1995;269(6 Pt3):S55-60.
Astin JA, Sierpina VS, Forys K, Clarridge B. Integration of the biopsychosocial model: perspectives of medical students and residents. Acad Med 2008;83(1):20-7.
Astin JA, Goddard TG, Forys K. Barriers to the integration of mind-body medicine: perceptions of physicians, residents, and medical students. Explore (NY) 2005;1(4):278-83.
Forrest AS, Walsh LJ, Isaacs G, Williams LM. PBL as a tool for integrating anatomy into the dental curriculum. J Dent Educ 1998;62(9):685-92.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.