Intravaginal Dinoprostone versus Intra Cervical Foley Catheter for Induction of Labor
,
Abstract
No Abstract
Moini A, Riazi K, Honar H, Hasanzadeh Z. Preinduction cervical ripening with the Foley catheter and saline infusion vs. cervical dinoprostone. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2003;83(2):211-3.
Barrilleaux PS, Bofill JA, Terrone DA, Magann EF, May WL, Morrison JC. Cervical ripening and induction of labor with misoprostol, dinoprostone gel, and a Foley catheter: a randomized trial of 3 techniques. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2002;186(6):1124-9.
Niromanesh S, Mosavi-Jarrahi A, Samkhaniani F. Intracervical Foley catheter balloon vs. prostaglandin in preinduction cervical ripening. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2003;81(1):23-7.
| Files | ||
| Issue | Vol 49, No 12 (2011) | |
| Section | Original Article(s) | |
| Keywords | ||
| No Keywords | ||
| Rights and permissions | |
|
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
How to Cite
1.
Jalilian N, Fakheri T, Ghadami MR. Intravaginal Dinoprostone versus Intra Cervical Foley Catheter for Induction of Labor. Acta Med Iran. 1;49(12):831.
