Original Article

The Protective Effect of Conditioning on Noise-Induced Hearing Loss Is Frequency-Dependent

Abstract

We compared the extent of temporary threshold shift (TTS) and hair cell loss following high level 4 kHz noise exposure with those preconditioned with moderate level 1 and 4 kHz octave band noise. Fifteen Male albino guinea pigs (300- 350 g in weight) were randomly allocated into three groups: those exposed to 4 kHz octave band noise at 102 dB SPL (group 1, n=5); those conditioned with 1 kHz octave band noise at 85 dB SPL, 6 hours per day for 5 days, then exposed to noise (group 2, n=5); those conditioned with 4 kHz octave band noise at 85 dB SPL, then exposed to noise (group 3, n=5). An hour and one week after noise exposure, threshold shifts were evaluated by auditory-evoked brainstem response (ABR) and then animals were euthanized for histological evaluation. We found that TTS and cochlear damage caused by noise exposure were significantly reduced by 1 kHz and 4 kHz conditioning (P<0.001). We also showed that 4 kHz protocol attenuates noise- induced TTS but no significant TTS reduction occurred by 1 kHz conditioning. Both protocol protected noise-induced cochlear damage. We concluded that lower tone conditioning could not protect against higher tone temporary noise-induced hearing loss, thus conditioning is a local acting and frequency-dependent phenomenon.

Miller JD, Watson CS, Covell WP. Deafening effects of noise on the cat. Acta Otolaryngol Suppl 1963;176:1-91.

Canlon B, Borg E, Flock A. Protection against noise trauma by pre-exposure to a low level acoustic stimulus. Hear Res 1988;34(2):197-200.

Kujawa SG, Liberman MC. Conditioning-related protection from acoustic injury: effects of chronic deefferentation and sham surgery. J Neurophysiol 1997;78(6):3095-106.

Niu X, Canlon B. Protection against noise trauma by sound conditioning. J Sound Vibration 2002;250:115-8.

Pourbakht A, Yamasoba T. Ebselen attenuates cochlear damage caused by acoustic trauma. Hear Res 2003;181(1-2):100-8.

Raphael Y, Altschuler RA. Scar formation after druginduced cochlear insult. Hear Res 1991;51(2):173-83.

Bohne BA. Healing of the noise damaged inner ear. In: Hirsh SK, Eldredge DH, Hirsh IJ, Silverman SR, editors. Hearing and Davis: Essays Honoring Hallowell Davis. Saint Louis, MO: Washington University press; 1976. p. 85-96.

Pourbakht A, Yamasoba T. Cochlear damage caused by continuous and intermittent noise exposure. Hear Res 2003;178(1-2):70-8.

Harding GW, Bohne BA. Relation of focal hair-cell lesions to noise-exposure parameters from a 4- or a 0.5-kHz octave band of noise. Hear Res 2009;254(1-2):54-63.

Tsuji J, Liberman MC. Intracellular labeling of auditory nerve fibers in guinea pig: central and peripheral projections. J Comp Neurol 1997;381(2):188-202.

Liberman MC, Kiang NY. Acoustic trauma in cats. Cochlear pathology and auditory-nerve activity. Acta Otolaryngol Suppl 1978;358:1-63.

Subramaniam M, Henderson D, Campo P, Spongr V. The effect of 'conditioning' on hearing loss from a high frequency traumatic exposure. Hear Res 1992;58(1):57-62.

Jacono AA, Hu B, Kopke RD, Henderson D, Van De Water TR, Steinman HM. Changes in cochlear antioxidant enzyme activity after sound conditioning and noise exposure in the chinchilla. Hear Res 1998;117(1-2):31-8.

Canlon B, Borg E, Löfstrand P. Physiological and morphological aspects to low level acoustic stimulation.In: Dancer AL, Henderson D, Salvi RJ, Hamernik RP, editors. The Effects of Noise on the Auditory System. St. Louis, MO: Mosby-Year Book Inc.; 1992.

Altschuler RA, Lim HH, Ditto J, Dolan D, Raphael Y. Protective mechanisms in the cochlea: Heat shockproteins. In: Salvi RJ, Henderson D, Fiorino F, Colletti A, editors. Auditory System Plasticity and Regeneration.Stuttgart: Thieme Medical Publishers; 1996. p. 202-12.

Zuo H, Cui B, She X, Wu M. Changes in Guinea pig cochlear hair cells after sound conditioning and noise exposure. J Occup Health 2008;50(5):373-9.

Files
IssueVol 50, No 10 (2012) QRcode
SectionOriginal Article(s)
Keywords
Auditory brainstem responses Conditioning Guinea pigs Hair cell Noise-induced hearing loss Threshold shift

Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
1.
Pourbakht A, Imani A. The Protective Effect of Conditioning on Noise-Induced Hearing Loss Is Frequency-Dependent. Acta Med Iran. 1;50(10):664-669.