Attitude toward Plagiarism among Iranian Medical Faculty Members
The goal of this study was to assess attitude towards plagiarism in faculty members of Medical School at Tehran University of Medical Sciences. One hundred and twenty medical faculty members of Tehran University of Medical Sciences were enrolled in this cross-sectional study. They were asked to answer to valid and reliable Persian version of attitude towards plagiarism questionnaire. Attitude toward plagiarism, positive attitude toward self-plagiarism and plagiarism acceptance were assessed. Eighty seven filled-up questionnaires were collected. Mean total number of correct answers was 11.6±3.1. Mean number of correct answers to questions evaluating self-plagiarism was 1.7±0.4 and mean number of correct answers to questions evaluating plagiarism acceptance was 1.4±0.2. There was no significant correlation between plagiarism acceptance and self-plagiarism (r=0.17, P=0.1). It is essential to provide materials (such as workshops, leaflets and mandatory courses) to make Iranian medical faculty members familiar with medical research ethics issues such as plagiarism.
Gilbert FJ, Denison AR. Research misconduct. Clin Radiol 2003; 58(7): 499-504.
Gunsalus CK. Scientific misconduct. Policy issues. In: Jones AH, McLellan F, editors. Ethical issues in biomedical publication. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press; 2000:223-49.
Mavrinac M, Brumini G, Bilić-Zulle L ,Petrovecki M.. Construction and Validation of Attitudes Toward Plagiarism Questionnaire. Croat Med J 2010; 51(3):195-201.
Lohsiriwat V, Lohsiriwat S. Fraud and deceit in published medical research. J Med Assoc Thai 2007; 90(10):2238-43.
Vasconcelos S, Leta J, Costa L, Pinto A, Sorenson MM. Discussing plagiarism in Latin American science.Brazilian researchers begin to address an ethical issue. EMBO Rep 2009; 10(7): 677-82
McCabe DL, Feghali TH A. Academic dishonesty in the Middle East: individual and contextual factors. Res Higher Educ 2008; 49:451-67.
Ghajarzadeh M, Hassanpour K, Fereshtehnejad S-M Jamali A, Nedjat S, Aramesh K. Attitude towards plagiarism among Iranian medical students. J Med Ethics doi; 2012:10.1136.
Ajzen I, Fishbein M. The influence of attitudes on behaviour. In: Albarracin D, Johnson BT, Zanna MP, editors. Handbook of attitudes and attitudes change: basic principles. Mahwah (NJ) Erlbaum 2005:173-221.
Armitage CJ, Conner M. Efficacy of the Theory of Planned Behaviour: a meta-analytic review. Br J Soc Psychol 2001; 40:471-99.
Shirazi B, Jafarey AM, Moazam F. Plagiarism and the medical fraternity: a study of knowledge and attitudes. J Pak Med Assoc 2010; 60:269-73.
Bloomfield L. WCopyfind 2.1 instructions. Available from: http://www.plagiarism.phys.virginia.edu/wcopy.html. Accessed: October 1. 2002
Austin MJ, Brown LD. Internet plagiarism: developing strategies to curb student academic dishonesty. The Internet and Higher Education1999; 2:21-33.
Braumoeller BF, Gaines BJ. Actions do speak louder than words: deterring plagiarism with the use of plagiarismdetection software. Political Science and Politics Online. Available from: http://www.apsanet.org/PS/dec01/braumoeller.cfm. Accessed: April 4, 2004.
Walker JR. Copyrights and conversations: intellectual property in the classroom. Computers and Composition 1998; 15:243-51
Rennie, SC, Crosby JR. Are "tomorrow's doctors" honest? Questionnaire study exploring medical students' attitudes and reported behaviour on academic misconduct. BMJ 2001; 322(7281):274-5.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.