Mean Right and Left Carotid Intima-Media Thickness Measures in Cases With/Without Coronary Artery Disease

  • Kamran Azarkish Department of Radiology, School of Medicine, Zanjan University of Medical Sciences, Zanjan, Iran.
  • Khalil Mahmoudi Department of Cardiology, School of Medicine, Zanjan University of Medical Sciences, Zanjan, Iran.
  • Mehdi Mohammadifar Mail Department of Radiology, School of Medicine, Zanjan University of Medical Sciences, Zanjan, Iran.
  • Mahsa Ghajarzadeh Department of Neurology, Brain and Spinal Injury Research Center (BASIR), Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Keywords:
Coronary artery disease, Intima-media thickness, Risk factor

Abstract

One of the important factors which should be considered in (Coronary artery disease) CAD cases is increased carotid intima-media thickness (IMT) which has been considered to be associated with coronary artery disease severity and cardiovascular events. The goal of this study was to compare risk factors and carotid IMT in cases with CAD and healthy subjects and to determine the association between severity of CAD and IMT. In this case-control study, 250 proved CAD cases and 250 healthy ones were enrolled. Ultrasound evaluation of carotid IMT Ultrasound quantification of the right and left carotid IMTs was obtained. Demographic characteristics (age and sex), risk factors (presence of diabetes, hyperlipidemia (HLP), hypertension (HTN) and smoking) were recorded for all participants. Presence of diabetes, HTN, HLP and mean age was significantly higher in patients than controls. There was positive correlation between IMTs and advancing CAD (for right IMT, rho=0.34, P<0.001, for IMT rho=0.47, P<0.001). Sex, HTN, HLP, right and left IMT measures were independent predictors of CAD. The best cutoff point for right IMT to differentiate patients from controls was 0.82 with sensitivity and specificity of 70% and 50% (AUC=0.70, P<0.001). The best cutoff point for left IMT to differentiate patients from controls was 0.85 with sensitivity and specificity of 80% and 55% (AUC=0.70, P<0.001). Carotid IMT increase should be considered as a surrogate factor for CAD.

References

Chambless LE, Heiss G, Folsom AR, et al. Association of coronary heart disease incidence with carotid arterial wall thickness and major risk factors: the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) Study, 1987-1993. Am J Epidemiol 1997;146(6):483-94.

Simon A, Gariepy J, Chironi G, et al. Intima-media thickness: a new tool for diagnosis and treatment of cardiovascular risk. J Hypertens 2002;20(2): 159-69.

Byington RP, Miller ME, Herrington D, et al. Rationale, design, and baseline characteristics of the prospective randomised evaluation of the vascular effects of norvasc trial (PREVENT). Am J Cardiol 1997;80(8):1087-90.

Cuspidi C, Ambrosioni E, Mancia G, et al. Role of echocardiography and carotid ultrasonography in stratifying risk in patients with essential hypertension: the assessment of prognostic risk observational survey. J Hypertens 2002;20(7):1307-14.

Davis PH, Dawson JD, Riley WA, et al. Carotid intimalmedia thickness is related to cardiovascular risk factors measured from childhood through middle age. The muscatine study. Circulation 2001;104(23):2815-9.

Suarez C, Lara I, Blanco F, et al. Ultrasonographic carotidfindings associated to obesity in the elderly patients. Am J Hypertens 2000;13(S2): 205A.

Sun Y, Lin CH, Lu CJ, et al. Carotid atherosclerosis, intima media thickness and risk factors: an analysis of 1781 asymptomatic subjects in Taiwan. Atherosclerosis 2002;164(1):89-94.

Tanaka H, Dinenno FA, Monahan KD, et al. Carotid artery wall hypertrophy with age is related to local systolic blood pressure in healthy men. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 2001;21(1):82-7.

Touboul PJ, Hennerici MG, Meairs S, et al. Mannheim carotid intima-media thickness consensus (2004–2006). An update on behalf of the Advisory Board of the 3rd and 4th Watching the Risk Symposium, 13th and 15th European Stroke Conferences, Mannheim, Germany, 2004, and Brussels, Belgium, 2006. Cerebrovasc Dis 2007;23(1):75-80.

Kablak-Ziembicka A, Tracz W, Przewlocki T, et al. Association of increased carotid intima-media thickness with the extent of coronary artery disease. Heart 2004;90(11):1286-90.

Crouse JR, Craven TE, Hagaman AP, et al. Association of coronary disease with segment-specific intimal-mediathickening of the extracranial carotid artery. Circulation 1995;92(5):1141-7.

Bots ML, Hoes AW, Koudstaal PJ, et al. Common carotid intima-media thickness and risk of stroke and myocardial infarction: the Rotterdam study. Circulation 1997;96(5):1432-7.

O’Leary DH, Polak JF, Kronmal RA, et al. Carotid-artery intima and media thickness as a risk factor for myocardial infarction and stroke in older adults. N Engl J Med 1999;340(1):14-22.

Liu XF, Cao J, Fan L, et al. Prevalence of and risk factors for aspirin resistance in elderly patients with coronary artery disease. J Geriatr Cardiol 2013;10(1):21-7.

Hill J, Timmis A. Exercise tolerance testing. BMJ 2002;324(7345):1084-7.

Iliceto S, Galiuto L, Marangelli V, et al. Clinical use of stress echocardiography: factors affecting diagnostic accuracy. Eur Heart J 1994;15(5):672-80.

How to Cite
1.
Azarkish K, Mahmoudi K, Mohammadifar M, Ghajarzadeh M. Mean Right and Left Carotid Intima-Media Thickness Measures in Cases With/Without Coronary Artery Disease. Acta Med Iran. 52(12):884-888.
Section
Articles