Vital Sign Assessment Directives Have Not Associated With Diagnostic Validity

  • Amir Mirhaghi Department of Medical-Surgical Nursing, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran. AND Evidence-Based Caring Research Center, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.
Keywords:
No keywords##

Abstract

No Abstract

References

Hossein Nejad H, Banaie M, Seyedhosseini, Davarani SH, Khazaeipour Z. Evaluation of the Significance ofVital Signs in the Up-Triage of Patients VisitingEmergency Department from Emergency Severity IndexLevel 3 to 2. Acta Med Iran 2016;54:366-9.

Mower WR, Sachs C, Nicklin EL, Safa P, Baraff LJ. Acomparison of pulse oximetry and respiratory rate inpatient screening. Respir Med 1996;90:593-9.

Mirhaghi A, Christ M. Revision for the Rapid EmergencyTriage and Treatment System Adult (RETTS-A) needed?Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2016 Apr 26;24:55.

Lovett PB, Buchwald JM, Stürmann K, Bijur P. Thevexatious vital: neither clinical measurements by nursesnor an electronic monitor provides accuratemeasurements of respiratory rate in triage. Ann EmergMed 2005;45:68-76.

Bianchi W, Dugas AF, Hsieh YH, Saheed M, Hill P,Lindauer C, et al. Revitalizing a vital sign: improvingdetection of tachypnea at primary triage. Ann Emerg Med2013;61:37-43.

Gunaydin YK, Çağlar A, Kokulu K, Yıldız CG, DündarZD, Akilli NB, et al. Triage using the EmergencySeverity Index (ESI) and seven versus three vital signs.209-16.

Mirhaghi A, Christ M. The conclusion validity of thetriage scales has been threatened. Notfall +Rettungsmedizin 2016;19:299-300.

Mirhaghi A, Kooshiar H, Esmaeili H, Ebrahimi M.Outcomes for Emergency Severity Index Triageimplementation in the Emergency Department. J ClinDiagn Res 2015;9:OC04-7.

Published
2017-08-19
How to Cite
1.
Mirhaghi A. Vital Sign Assessment Directives Have Not Associated With Diagnostic Validity. Acta Med Iran. 55(6):414-414.
Section
Letter to the Editor