Can We Predict Patients’ Cooperation During Phacoemulsification Surgery Under Topical Anesthesia?

  • Abdolreza Medghalchi Department of Eye, School of Medicine, Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Rasht, Iran. AND Eye Research Center, Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Rasht, Iran.
  • Mitra Akbari Department of Eye, School of Medicine, Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Rasht, Iran. AND Eye Research Center, Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Rasht, Iran.
  • Reza Soltani Moghadam Department of Eye, School of Medicine, Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Rasht, Iran. AND Eye Research Center, Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Rasht, Iran.
  • Yousef Alizadeh Department of Eye, School of Medicine, Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Rasht, Iran. AND Eye Research Center, Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Rasht, Iran.
  • Abtin Heirati Department of Eye, School of Medicine, Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Rasht, Iran. AND Eye Research Center, Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Rasht, Iran.
Keywords:
Topical, Anesthesia, phacoemulsification, cataract, Success, Cooperation

Abstract

Topical anesthesia (TA) may accompany more discomfort for some patients during cataract surgery. We aimed to evaluate the potential factors that can be used for predicting patient’s cooperation during phacoemulsification surgery under TA. One hundred sixty consecutive cases that were candidate for phacoemulsification surgery were enrolled in this prospective study. Patients’ sex, age, place of residence (urban or rural), education level (literate and illiterate) and physical examination variables (visual acuity, reaction to eye drop, cooperation during tonometry, and reaction to press on the lacrimal sac before surgery) evaluated. Patients’ cooperation during surgery was classified as successful (good and satisfactory) or failed (weak) groups. In this study, 103(64.4%) cases showed good or satisfactory cooperation, and others had weak cooperation. There was no correlation between patients’ cooperation during surgery and sex (P=0.2), age (P=0.7), place of residency (P=0.3), and education level (P=0.3). The successful group showed a higher rate of non-reaction to eye drop (P=0.0001), good cooperation during tonometry (P=0.0001), non-reaction to press on lacrimal sac (P=0.0001), and lower visual acuity (P=0.045). In the multi-logistic regression, non-reaction to eye drop (OR=66.4), good cooperation during tonometry (OR=21.2, good vs. bad and OR=7.2, satisfactory vs. bad), lower visual acuity (OR=7, <0.1 vs. 0.1-0.4 d) are the significant predictors for the success of TA. This study showed that some ocular examination tests before surgery (visual acuity, reaction to eye drop, cooperation during tonometry, and reaction to press on the lacrimal sac) could predict patients’ cooperation during phacoemulsification surgery under TA.

References

1. Khairallah M, Kahloun R, Bourne R, Limburg H, Flaxman SR, Jonas JB, et al. Number of people blind or visually impaired by cataract worldwide and in world regions, 1990 to 2010. Investigative ophthalmology & visual science. 2015;56(11):6762-9.
2. Kauh CY, Blachley TS, Lichter PR, Lee PP, Stein JD. Geographic variation in the rate and timing of cataract surgery among US communities. JAMA ophthalmology. 2016 ;134(3):267-76.
3. Park SJ, Lee JH, Kang SW, Hyon JY, Park KH. Cataract and cataract surgery: nationwide prevalence and clinical determinants. Journal of Korean medical science. 2016 ;31(6):963-71.
4. Alboim C, Kliemann RB, Soares LE, Ferreira MM, Polanczyk CA, Biolo A. The impact of preoperative evaluation on perioperative events in patients undergoing cataract surgery: a cohort study. Eye. 2016;30(12):1614.
5. Zhao LQ, Zhu H, Zhao PQ, Wu QR, Hu YQ. Topical anesthesia versus regional anesthesia for cataract surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Ophthalmology. 2012;119(4):659-67.
6. Nouvellon E, Cuvillon P, Ripart J, Viel EJ. Anaesthesia for cataract surgery. Drugs & aging. 2010;27(1):21-38.
7. Kumar C, Dowd T. Ophthalmic regional anaesthesia. Current Opinion in Anesthesiology. 2008;21(5):632-7.
8. Fraser SG, Siriwadena D, Jamieson H, Girault J, Bryan SJ. Indicators of patient suitability for topical anesthesia. Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery. 1997;23(5):781-3.
9. Kang YK, Kim MJ, Kim HK, Chun BY. Clinical Analysis of Ocular Parameters Contributing to Intraoperative Pain during Standard Phacoemulsification.J Ophthalmology 2017;2017:9463871.
10. Patel BC, Burns TA, Crandall A, Shomaker ST, Pace NL, van Eerd A, et al. Comparison of topical and retrobulbar anesthesia for cataract surgery. Ophthalmology. 1996;103(8):1196-203.
11. Omulecki W, Laudańska-Olszewska I, Synder A. Factors affecting patient cooperation and level of pain perception during phacoemulsification in topical and intracameral anesthesia. European journal of ophthalmology. 2009;19(6):977-83.
12. Figueira EC, Sharma NS, Ooi JL, Masselos K, Lee KJ, Rosenberg ML, et al. The Lanindar test: a method of evaluating patient suitability for cataract surgery using assisted topical anaesthesia. Eye. 2009;23(2):284.
13. Akkaya S, Özkurt YB, Aksoy S, Kökçen HK. Differences in pain experience and cooperation between consecutive surgeries in patients undergoing phacoemulsification. International ophthalmology. 2017 ;37(3):545-52.
14. Dogan R, Karalezli A, Sahin D, Gumus F. Comparison of sedative drugs under peribulbar or topical anesthesia during phacoemulsification. Ophthalmic Surgery, Lasers and Imaging Retina. 2012;43(2):121-7.
Published
2020-01-26
How to Cite
1.
Medghalchi A, Akbari M, Soltani Moghadam R, Alizadeh Y, Heirati A. Can We Predict Patients’ Cooperation During Phacoemulsification Surgery Under Topical Anesthesia?. Acta Med Iran. 57(7):412-415.
Section
Articles