Original Article

Decisions for Treatment of Neonates With Poor Prognosis: A Qualitative Study

Abstract

Advances in medicine and medical technology have presented new moral challenges in terms of the management of extremely preterm infants and newborns with severe anomalies and advanced asphyxia. The aim of the present study was to examine the attitudes of health care providers and parents regarding decisions about the treatment of these neonates. The attitude of the Shia clerics is assessed in this study as well. In this qualitative content analysis research, data were collected through semi-structured interviews and focus group discussions (FGDs) with 98 participants, including physicians, nurse practitioners, medical ethicists, Shia clerics, and parents. Purposive sampling was employed by selecting those members of the community whom we thought would provide us with the best information and were also eager to participate. Data collection continued until data saturation was reached. Data analysis was carried out using conventional content analysis. Analysis of the data resulted in the extraction of 332 codes along with the following four categories: the necessity for preparation of a national guideline for the management of neonates with poor prognosis, the establishment of hospital neonatal-management committees, decision-making regarding the limits of viability, and parental support. This study affirms that the responsibility in terms of decision-making for neonates with poor prognosis lies upon hospital neonatal-management committees based on approved national guidelines such that decisions are made according to the aforementioned guidelines, Islamic moral codes, and scope of services available in medical units. This study dismisses individual decision-making and underlines the responsibility of a hospital neonatal-management committee in making decisions based on approved guidelines that conform to the regulations of national law and Islamic moral codes that determine the continuation or withdrawal of medical care and treatment of infants with a poor prognosis while bearing in mind that regulations, hospital facilities, resources, and other conditions differ in various hospitals within the country and with developed countries.

1. World Health Organization. Feto-maternal nutrition and low birth weight. [Internet]. [Cited 2018 Aug 29]; Available from: http://www.who.int/nutrition/topics/feto_maternal/en/Page.
2. Martin RJ, Fanaroff AA, Walsh MC. Fanaroff and Martin's Neonatal-Perinatal Medicine diseases of the Fetus and Infant. 10th ed. Elsevier/Mosby; 2015.
3. Wilson-Costello D, Friedman H, Minich N, Fanaroff AA, Hack M. Improved survival rates with increased neurodevelopmental disability for extremely low birth weight infants in the 1990s. Pediatrics. 2005; 115(4): 997–1003.
4. Su BH, Hsieh WS, Hsu CH, Chang JH, Lien R, Lin CH, et al. Neonatal outcomes of extremely preterm infants from Taiwan: comparison with Canada, Japan, and the USA. Pediatr Neonatol. 2015; 56(1): 46-52.
5. Seri I, Evans J. Limits of viability: definition of the gray zone. J Perinatol. 2008; 28(S1): S4-8.
6. Morgan MA, Goldenberg RL, Schulkin J. Obstetrician-gynecologists' practices regarding preterm birth at the limit of viability. J Matern Neonatal Med. 2008; 21(2): 115-21.
7. Halamek LP. Prenatal consultation at the limits of viability. Neoreviews. 2003; 4(6): 153e–156.
8. Berger TM, Bernet V, El Alama S, Fauchère JC, Hösli I, Irion O, et al. Perinatal care at the limit of viability between 22 and 26 completed weeks of gestation in Switzerland. Swiss Med Wkly. 2011; 141: w13280.
9. Kaempf JW, Tomlinson MW, Campbell B, Ferguson L, Stewart VT. Counseling pregnant women who may deliver extremely premature infants: medical care guidelines, family choices, and neonatal outcomes. Pediatrics. 2009; 123(6): 1509–15.
10. Dalili H, Fallahi M, Moradi S, Nayeri F, Shariat M, Rashidian A. Clinical outcome and cost of treatment and care for neonates less than 1000 grams admitted to Vali-e ASR Hospital. Health Econ Rev. 2014; 4:21.
11. Rebagliato M, Cuttini M, Broggin L, Berbik I, de Vonderweid U, Hansen G, et al. Neonatal end-of-life decision making: Physicians' attitudes and relationship with self-reported practices in 10 European countries. JAMA. 2000; 284(19): 2451–9.
12. Ghaffari Saravi V, Zarghami M, Sheikh Moonesi F, Moodi S, Khadem F, Karami M. Attitude and practice of pediatrics and gynecology physicians in the cities of Sari and Babol regarding non-initiation and discontinuation of resuscitation in cases of gravely Ill newborns. J Maz Univ Med Sci. 2009; 19(70): 33–40.
13. Huang LC, Chen CH, Liu HL, Lee HY, Peng NH, Wang TM, et al. The attitudes of neonatal professionals towards end-of-life decision-making for dying infants in Taiwan. J Med Ethics. 2013; 39(6): 382–6.
14. Willems DL, Verhagen AAE, van Wijlick E. Infants' best interests in end-of-life care for newborns. Pediatrics. 2014; 134(4): e1163–8.
15. Weiner GM, Zaichkin J, Kattwinkel J, American Academy of Pediatrics, American Heart Association. Textbook of Neonatal Resuscitation (NRP). American Academy of Pediatrics. 2016; 313p.
16. Nayeri F, Asghari F, Baser A, Janani L, Shariat M, Ebrahim B. Views and Decisions of Physicians in Encountering Neonates with Poor Prognosis. Arch Iran Med. 2017; 20(3): 172-7.
Files
IssueVol 60, No 6 (2022) QRcode
SectionOriginal Article(s)
DOI https://doi.org/10.18502/acta.v60i6.10041
Keywords
Poor prognosis newborns Decision-making Limits of viability
Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
1.
Shariat M, Asghari F, Motevasel Arani M, Farrokhzad N, Mohammadzadeh Y, Mohammadi Shahboulaghi F, Abroun A, Mirzatavoli S, Janani Z, Nayeri FS. Decisions for Treatment of Neonates With Poor Prognosis: A Qualitative Study. Acta Med Iran. 2022;60(6):358-365.